LE
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 revenue fell sequentially to $947.4M as completions activity slowed and pricing headwinds intensified; Adjusted EBITDA declined to $127.7M with GAAP diluted EPS of $0.26 and adjusted EPS of -$0.06 .
- Versus Wall Street consensus (S&P Global), Liberty modestly beat adjusted EPS (-$0.06 vs -$0.0746*), missed revenue ($947.4M vs $964.8M*), and missed EBITDA ($127.7M vs $129.8M*). The miss was driven by weaker industry activity and pricing pressure; the adjusted EPS beat reflects smaller loss than expected even as GAAP EPS benefited from investment gains .
- Guidance shifts: 2025 total CapEx lowered to ~$525–$550M (from ~$575M), Q4 cash taxes expected to be minimal, and tax rate maintained at ~25% .
- Strategic catalysts: dividend raised 13% to $0.09/share , expansion of power generation plan to ~500MW by end-2026 and >1GW by 2027, and financing clarity (project-level, largely non-recourse debt backed by PPAs/ESAs) .
- Notable clarification: management corrected the press release characterization of Forge as a “large language model,” stating it is a distributed agentic AI system powering automation and performance gains in the field .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record operational efficiency: “highest combined average daily pumping efficiency and safety performance in Liberty’s history,” with quarterly records in pumping hours, horsepower hours, and proppant volumes .
- Technology-driven cost savings: DigiPrime pumps showing >30% total maintenance cost savings; automation via STEM Commander reduced time to reach fluid injection rate by 65% and improved hydraulic efficiency by 5–10% .
- Capital allocation and power growth: dividend lifted 13% to $0.09/share; power capacity targeting ~500MW delivered by end-2026 and >1GW by 2027 .
What Went Wrong
- Pricing pressure and activity softness: sequential revenue -9% and adjusted EBITDA -29% as market-driven pricing headwinds and lower completions activity weighed; adjusted net loss of ~$10M .
- YoY deterioration: revenue -17% YoY and adjusted EBITDA -48% YoY reflecting industry-wide slowdown and underutilized fleets, particularly for conventional equipment .
- Leverage higher, liquidity lower: net debt rose by $99M sequentially to ~$240M; liquidity declined to $146M, with cash of ~$13M at quarter-end .
Financial Results
Core P&L metrics vs prior quarters
Margins (EBITDA Margin %) vs prior quarters
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Q3 results vs Wall Street consensus (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Selected KPIs and balance items
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Liberty achieved revenue of $947 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $128 million in the third quarter, despite a slowdown in industry completions activity and market pricing pressure.”
- “Early indications show total maintenance cost savings are greater than 30% on DigiPrime pumps… Fleet automation is driving a 65% improvement in the time to deliver the desired fluid injection rate and a 5% to 10% improvement in hydraulic efficiency.”
- “We mistakenly called [Forge] a large language model in our press release… it’s a distributed agentic intelligence system built for the field.”
- “We now expect to have approximately 500 megawatts of generation delivered by the end of 2026 and over one gigawatt of cumulative power generation by the end of 2027.”
- “As such, we increased our quarterly cash dividend by 13%…”
Q&A Highlights
- Power demand visibility and contracts: Sales pipeline more than doubled in last 90 days; LOIs/term sheets for “more than a few gigawatts”; data centers likely comprise a higher mix of demand .
- Financing structure: For large-load projects, ~70% project-level, non-recourse debt backed by PPAs/ESAs; remainder funded via corporate cash flow/debt and potential minority partners; smaller (<100MW) projects funded on balance sheet .
- CapEx per MW and payback: Installed generation ~$1.5–$1.6M/MW; unlevered cash returns in high-teens; payback ~5+ years for 15+ year contracts and ~3 years for shorter 5–7-year contracts .
- Capacity ordering/timing: Vast majority of incremental 600MW ordered; near-term generation capacity scarce; deployment timelines ~6 months for reciprocating packages and ~9 months for larger/turbine/power hall implementations .
- Technology mix: Portfolio leans heavily to gas reciprocating engines for superior heat rate (~45% thermal efficiency simple cycle vs turbines); turbines used for density; future inclusion of SMRs (Oklo) and fuel cells in specific sites .
Estimates Context
- Consensus (S&P Global) for Q3 2025: adjusted/primary EPS -$0.0746*, revenue $964.8M*, EBITDA $129.8M*; actuals: adjusted EPS -$0.06, revenue $947.4M, adjusted EBITDA $127.7M → EPS beat, revenue/EBITDA miss .
- Number of estimates: EPS (6), revenue (9).
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term OFS cycle softness and pricing pressure compressed margins; EBITDA margin fell to ~12.6%* in Q3 from ~16.5%* in Q2, highlighting a more challenging price/volume mix . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Management is reallocating horsepower to simul-frac and prioritizing long-term customers to defend utilization and efficiency in a softer market .
- Strategic pivot to power is accelerating: ~500MW by end-2026 and >1GW by 2027 with non-recourse project financing, positioning Liberty for multi-decade contracted cash flows .
- Capital discipline intact: 2025 CapEx trimmed to ~$525–$550M; dividend lifted to $0.09; minimal Q4 cash taxes expected—supportive of FCF defensiveness through the trough .
- Technology moat expanding: DigiPrime cost savings (>30%), automation gains, and the Forge agentic AI platform underpin cost/efficiency advantages likely to drive share gains as activity normalizes .
- Macro watch: CEO’s explicit critique of tariffs underscores input-cost and equipment-availability risks, while management sees improving frac fundamentals later in 2026 as oversupply peaks and attrition tightens capacity .
- Trading lens: In the short term, continued pricing pressure and seasonal Q4 patterns could weigh on results; medium-term thesis hinges on execution against power milestones, contract conversion, and maintenance of OFS efficiency advantages .